Policy Canvas: A Tool for Fostering Convergence Between Policymakers and Policy Scholars

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Financial Sciences, Management and Economics, University of Kashan

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Progress Engineering, Faculty of Management, Economics, and Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology

3 University Instructor, Faculty of Skills, Islamic Azad University

4 Professor, Faculty of Public Management and Organizational Sciences, School of Management, University of Tehran

Abstract

Objective: The growing complexity of public issues and the multiplicity of actors in the governance arena have highlighted the need for tools that can facilitate communication between policymakers and policy researchers. In this context, the Policy Canvas emerges as a visual and interactive framework that, by simplifying concepts and clarifying the relationships among policy components, provides a basis for shared understanding and convergence.
Research Method: This study employs a qualitative approach using the method of qualitative content analysis to examine the capacities of this tool. Data were collected through two channels: first, a systematic analysis of articles indexed in the Scopus database; and second, semi-structured interviews with experts and specialists in the field of public policy. The data gathered from these two sources were then organized and analyzed through three stages of open, axial, and selective coding.
Findings and Conclusion: The findings indicate that the Policy Canvas can serve as a common language among actors in this domain and, by creating semantic coherence, enhance the linkage between research and practice. Moreover, using this tool contributes to more data-driven decision-making, as well as greater transparency and rationality in the policy-making process. The integrated results of the study show that the effectiveness of the canvas depends on prerequisites such as institutional capacity, policy literacy, a culture of dialogue, professional ethics, and inter-organizational collaboration. Overall, the Policy Canvas, as an innovative tool, can help bridge the gap between theory and practice and, by supporting collective learning and stakeholder participation, improve the quality of public decision-making and strengthen governance sustainability.

Keywords


  1. منابع فارسی:

    1- خوبرو، محمدتقی؛ الوانی، سید مهدی؛ رحمتی، محمدحسین و جندقی، غلامرضا. (1397). یکپارچگی صنایع دفاعی و غیردفاعی: یک بوم‌نگاری خط‌مشی در صنعت دفاعی. بهبود مدیریت. شماره 4 (پیاپی 42). 96-49.

    2- سوداگر، هاشم؛ امیری، علی‌نقی و امامی، سیدمجتبی. (1397). واکاوی و تحلیل مفهوم خط‌مشی عمومی: ماهیت، صفات و غایت. مدیریت دولتی. 10(4)، 506-528.

    3- نوری، فرامرز و سید صمد حسینی. (1402). آسیب‌شناسی اجرای خط‌مشی‌های زیست‌بوم نوآوری و فناوری در راستای توسعه سرمایه‌گذاری‌های استانی. حکمرانی متعالی. سال چهارم، شماره 4 (پیاپی 16). 103-81.

    References:

    1. Al-Jayyousi, O., Hasan, W. N. W., Mohamed Saniff, S., Sever, S. D., & Tok, E. 2023. A critical discourse analysis on climate change in a globalized world: The nexus of Islam and sustainable development. Sustainability, 15(19), 14515.
    2. Dye, Thomas. 2011. Understanding public policy. 13th edition, Pearson
    3. Fatima, S., Desouza, K. C., Buck, C., & Fielt, E. 2022. Public AI canvas for AI-enabled public value: A design science approach. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101722.
    4. Gervais, D. (2012). Country clubs, empiricism, blogs and innovation: The future of international intellectual property norm making in the wake of ACTA. In Trade governance in the digital age: World Trade Forum (pp. 323-343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    5. Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (1995). Studying public policy. Policy cycles and policy.
    6. Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2026). Studying Public Policy: Connecting Theory to Practice. Cambridge University Press.
    7. Mantle, G., Leslie, J., Parsons, S., Plenty, J., & Shaffer, R. (2006). Establishing children's wishes and feelings for family court reports: the significance attached to the age of the child. Childhood, 13(4), 499-518.
    8. Mureddu, F., Schmeling, J., & Kanellou, E. 2020. Research challenges for the use of big data in policy-making. Transforming government: People, process and policy, 14(4), 593-604.
    9. Osman, F.A., 2002. Public policy making: theories and their implications in developing countries. Asian affairs, 24(3), pp. 37-52.
    10. Puglia, M., Parker, L., Clube, R. K., Demirel, P., & Aurisicchio, M. 2024. The circular policy canvas: Mapping the European Union's policies for a sustainable fashion textiles industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 204, 107459.
    11. Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. 2010. Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. In DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2010).
    12. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. 2019, Research Methods for Business Students. (8 ed.) Pearson
    13. Schmeling, J., Marx, A., Glikman, Y., Gamazo, E., G. & Markaki, O. I. 2019. Big Policy Canvas: Needs and Trends in Public Administrations.
    14. Stallworthy, M. (2004). Once more unto the breach: English law rationales and environmental assessment. Journal of Planning and Environment Law, 1472-1490.
    15. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage.
    16. Tranquillo, J., Kline, W. A., & Hixson, C. 2018, June. Student-created canvases as a way to inform decision-making in a capstone design sequence. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.