Identification and explanation of the application of the government performance evaluation model in the field of health, based on the institutional isomorphism theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of management and economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran. Iran.

2 Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran

3 Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of management and economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of management and economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The main challenge of the developing countries is to measure the government performance, especially the health subsystem. In Iran, policies and institutional frameworks, especially the general policies of the health system, emphasize on measuring the performance of the health sector. The current state of health indicates the government inability to implement these policies. The purpose of this study is to identify and explain the application of the government's performance evaluation model in the field of health, based on the Institutional Isomorphism theory.
124 concepts and 20 components were classified under 4 main categories that affect government performance evaluation, including "cultural and value factors", "economic factors", "laws and policies" and "structural-technological factors".

Keywords

References

منابع:
 -ابوالمعالی، فاطمه‌السادات؛ دانش‌فرد، کرم‌اله و پورعزت، علی‌اصغر (1399). طراحی الگوی اصلاحات اداری با رویکرد حکمرانی دیجیتال. مدیریت سازمان‌های دولتی، 8(3)، 11-32.
-ادیب‌زاده، مریم، نجف‌بیگی، رضا؛ موسی‌خانی، مرتضی؛ دانش‌فرد، کرم‌اله و عالم‌تبریز، اکبر (1396). طراحی الگوی مدیریت عملکرد برای سازمان‌های دولتی. مدیریت منابع در نیروی انتظامی، 5(3)، 1-24.
 -دهنوی، حامد و مصدق‌راد، علی‌محمد (1397). ارزشیابی عملکرد بیمارستان‌های ایران: مرور نظام‌مند و فراتحلیل دو دهه پژوهش. پایش،17(6)، 603-615.
 -رفیع‌زاده، علاءالدین و میرسپاسی، ناصر (1396). طراحی مدل مدیریت عملکرد با تأکید بر آموزش عالی. مطالعات اندازه‌گیری و ارزشیابی آموزشی، 7(17)، 33-55.
 -سیف‌الدین اصل، امیرعلی؛ ثقفی، فاطمه؛ ذوالفقارزاده، محمدمهدی و حمیدی، مهدی (1394). مقایسه عملکرد وزارت بهداشت, درمان و آموزش پزشکی و وزارت علوم, تحقیقات و فناوری ایران با شاخص‌های کلیدی معرف توسعه پژوهش با استفاده از تکنیک دلفی فازی. مدیریت توسعه فناوری, 2(4 ), 51-74.
-قلی‌پور، آرین (1385). هیدروکراسی یا بوروکراسی. دانش مدیریت، 19(75)، 103ـ123.
-قلی‌پور، آرین (1399). جامعه‌شناسی سازمانها (رویکرد جامعه‌شناختی به سازمان و مدیریت). چ (18). تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها «سمت».
-کیانی، پاکنوش؛ پورعزت، علی‌اصغر؛ دانش‌فرد، کرم‌اله و غلامرضا معمارزاده طهران (1401). شناسایی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های کاربست الگوی ارزشیابی عملکرد دولت در حوزه سلامت. مطالعات مدیریت دولتی ایران، 5(1)، 31-58،doi:10.22034/jipas.2022.312690.1273
-کیانی، پاکنوش؛ پورعزت، علی‌اصغر؛ دانش‌فرد، کرم‌اله و غلامرضا معمارزاده طهران (1401). طراحی الگوی ارزشیابی عملکرد دولت در حوزه سلامت. چشم‌انداز مدیریت دولتی، آماده انتشار،. doi: 10.52547/jpap.2022.226130.1166
 -محمدی، محمد و شریف‌زاده، فتاح (1396). طراحی الگوی مدیریت عملکرد با رویکرد توسعه منابع انسانی در بخش دولت. آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی، 4(15)، 133-159.
 -مصدق‌راد، علی‌محمد و رحیمی‌تبار، پریسا (1398). الگوی حاکمیت نظام سلامت ایران: یک مطالعه تطبیقی. علوم پزشکی رازی، 26(9)، 10-28.
-میرزایی، اباسط؛ طیبی، سیدجمال‌الدین؛ نصیری‌پور، امیر اشکان و ریاحی، لیلا (1395). شاخص‌های مالی تأثیرگذار و قابل آموزش برای مدیران در ارزیابی عملکرد بیمارستان‌های دانشگاه‌های علوم پزشکی ایران، نوآوری‌های مدیریت آموزشی، 12(1)، 85-92.
-واحدی، حسین؛ حاج‌علیان، فرشاد؛ جهانگیرفرد، مجید و مجیبی، تورج (1399). طراحی الگوی مدیریت عملکرد در حوزه سلامت ایران. مدیریت پرستاری، 9(3). 87- 100.
-وفایی نجار، علی؛ ابراهیمی پور، حسین؛ هوشمند، الهه و زمردی نیت، هادی. (1397). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی شاخص های ارزیابی عملکرد بیمارستان با ترکیبی از کارت امتیازی متوازن و تکنیک دلفی (بیمارستان منتصریه). نوید نو. 21(66)،1-11. doi: 10.22038/nnj.2018.31272.1122
References:
-Alves, I., & Lourenço, S M. (2021). Subjective performance evaluation and managerial work outcomes. Accounting and Business Research, DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2021.1959292
-Aras, G., N. Tezcan., & O.K. Furtuna. (2018). Multidimensional comprehensive corporate sustainability performance evaluation model: Evidence from an emerging market banking sector. Journal of cleaner production. 185: p. 600-609.
-Barbieri, M., Micacchi, L., Vidè, F., & Valotti, G. (2021). The Performance of Performance Appraisal Systems: A Theoretical Framework for Public Organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X211043560.
-Bindels, E., Boerebach, B., Scheepers, R., Nooteboom, A., Scherpbier, A., Heeneman, S., & Lombarts, K. (2021). Designing a system for performance appraisal: balancing physicians' accountability and professional development. BMC health services research, 21(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06818-1.
-Bo su., Si-Qi F., & Hong-Juan ,T. (2019). Public Hospital Cost Management and Performance Evaluation from the Perspective of DRGs, 5th International Conference on Economics and Management.
-chandrasekhar, k, m., narayanan, m.k., vasudev, c. m., sreedharan,. e., haldar, p. c., & trivedi, p., (2019). performance management in government. center for good governance department  of administrative reforms and public grievances, ministry of personnel, government of india, india retrieved from https:// darpg.gov. in/sites/default/files/performance_ management.pdf (accessed in Jan.03.2019).
-Chen, X., Yi, N., Zhang, L., & Li, D. (2018). Does institutional pressure foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from China’s top 100 companies. Journal of Cleaner Production,188, 304–311
-Choi, M., Lee, J., & Hwang, K. (2018). Information Systems Security (ISS) of E-Government for Sustainability: A Dual Path Model of ISS Influenced by Institutional Isomorphism. Sustainability, 10(5), 1555.
-Chu, Z., Wang, L., & Lai, F. (2019). Customer pressure and green innovations at third party logistics providers in China: The moderation effect of organizational culture. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(1), 57-75.
-Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 10-27.
-DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147.
-Donghun, Y. (2021). How Can Personnel Performance Evaluation Systems Be Improved? . SAGE Open, (),1 –12. doi:10.1177/2158244020986538.
-Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., & Helo, P. (2019). Supplier relationship management for circular economy: influence of external pressures and top
management commitment. Management Decision, 57(4), 767-790.
-Rubin, E. V., & Edwards, A. (2018). The performance of performance appraisal systems: Understanding the linkage between appraisal structure and appraisal discrimination complaints. The International Journal of Human Resource management. Advance online publication. 1-20. doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1424015
-Gill, D. (2019). The Fiscal Responsibility Act 1994: How a Nonbinding Policy Instrument Proved Highly Powerful, Successful Public Policy: Lessons from Australia and New Zealand, edited by Joannah Luetjens et al., ANU Press, Acton ACT, Australia, 2019,  423–452.
-Gogoi, Krishnasree., & Baruah, Papori. (2016). An Ethical Evaluation of Performance Appraisal System. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 6(1). ISSN 2231-492X. 6.
-HM, Treasury.(2018). The Green Book: Central Government Guidance on Appraisal and Evaluation. London: HM Treasury.
-Jiang, D.K., & Liu, Z.K. (2014) Research on Application of Balanced Scorecard in the Government Performance Appraisal. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 91-96.
-Jin, R. Q., & Rainey, H. G. (2020). Positive in public service: Government personnel, constrained incentives, and positive work attitudes. International Public Management Journal, 23(1), 25–56.
-Kamali, F., Yamani, N., Changiz, T., & Zoubin, F. (2018). Factors influencing the results of faculty evaluation in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of education and health promotion, 7, 13. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_107_17
-Kirkpatrick, Donald L., & James D. Kirkpatrick .(2006). Evaluating training programs:the four levels. Third edition. San Francisco: Berrett- Koehler Publishers, Inc.
-Lee. C. (2021). Factors influencing the credibility of performance measurement of nonprofit, International Review of public Administration12(2).
-Madden,C.; Clayton, M.; Canary, H. E.; Towsley, G.; Cloyes, K.; Lund, D. (2017). Rules of performance in the nursing home: A grounded theory of nurse–CNA communication. Geriatric Nursing,38 (2), 378-384.
-Majidi. S. Daneshkohan . A., Zarei. E., & Ashktorab. T.(2020). Perspectives of health workers on annual performance appraisal: A study in primary health care, international Journal of Healthcare Management, DOI:10.1080/20479700.2020.1755810
-Miles R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process; New York: McGraw-Hill.
-Murphy, K. R. (2020). Performance evaluation will not die, but it should. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 13-31.
-Nguyen, D. T. N., Teo, S. T., & Ho, M. (2018). Development of human resource management in Vietnam: A semantic analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(1), 241–284.
-Ojha, H., Regmi, U., Shrestha, K. K., Paudel, N. S., Amatya, S. M., Zwi, A. B., & Banjade, M. R. (2020). Improving science-policy interface: Lessons from thepolicy lab methodology in Nepal's community forest governance. Forest Policyand Economics, 114,1-10. 101997.
-Önen, Z., & Sayın, S. (2018). Evaluating healthcare system efficiency of OECD countries: a DEA-Based study. In: Operations Research Applications in Health Care Management, 141–158.
-Peiffer-Smadja. N., Lucet, J. C., Bendjelloul, G., Bouadma, L., Gerard, S., Choquet, C., Jacques, S., Khalil, A., Maisani, P., Casalino, E., & Descamps, D. (2020). Challenges and issues about organizing a hospital to respond to theCOVID-19 outbrea. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 26(1), 669-672.
-Rashidian, A., Jahanmehr, N., Farzadfar, F, Khosravi A, Shariati M, Sari AA, Damiri., & S, Majdzadeh, R. (2021). Performance evaluation and ranking of regional primary health care and public health Systems in Iran. BMC Health Serv Res 21, 1168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07092-x.
-Schoenmaker, D. (2021). Greening monetary policy. Climate Policy, 21(4), 581-592.
-Schütte, S., Acevedo, P., & Flahault, A. (2018). Health systems around the world - a comparison of existing health system rankings. Journal of global health, 8(1), 010407. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.010407.
-Shafritz . Jay M., Russell . E. W.,. Borick  Christopher, P., &  Hyde .Albert,C.  (2017).  Introducing Public Administration. New York, NY. London, Eng: Routledge.
-Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-Turban, E., Pollard, C., & Wood, G. (2018). Information technology for management: On-demand strategies for performance, growth and sustainability. John Wiley & Sons.
-World Health Statistics (2021). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
-World Health Statistics (2022). Monitoring health for the SDGs. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
-Yang, C. S. (2018). An analysis of institutional pressures, green supply chain management, and green performance in the container shipping context. Transportation Research Part D:
Transport and Environment, 61, 246–260.
-Zeng, H., Chen, X., Xiao, X., & Zhou, Z. (2017). Institutional pressures, sustainable supply chain management, and circular economy capability: Empirical evidence from Chinese eco-industrial park firms. Journal of cleaner production, 155(1), 54-65.
Governance and Development
Volume 2, Issue 2
June 2022
Pages 25-54

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics