Planning and managing the development of rural technology and innovation system in Sistan region

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Entrepreneurship, University of Sistan and Baluchistan

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Damghan University

Abstract


Innovation and technology system plays s vital role in the development process. For this reason, the development of agricultural products and the identification of barriers affecting is a comprehensive and national issue. The purpose of this study was to identify and identify the barriers affecting the development of agricultural technological innovation system in Sistan region using FAHP technique. The statistical population consisted of 40 elits and experts of Jihad-e-Keshavarzi in Sistan region. The main instrument for data collection was questionnaire, its validity and content was verified by experts of Jihad-e-Keshavarzi. The results of this study indicate that barriers to entrepreneurship and formation with weight (0.27) have the greatest impact, and research and development barriers, legal barriers and policy-making, innovative and technological barriers, Institutional - structural, financial barriers - credit and educational barriers - with a weight of 0.19, 0.15, 0.14, 0.13, 0.08 and 0.04, respectively, are in the next priority. In order to develop the technological innovation system of agriculture, it is recommended that organizations and institutions must be established to encourage the farmers of the Sistan region for entrepreneurship in accordance with the facilities of the region.

Keywords

References

منابع
-درویشی ­جزی، عبدالکریم. (1373). شاخص­های اثرات اجتماعی و اقتصادی و پایداری در مدل برنامه­ریزی توسعه کشاورزی، نشریه اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه، شماره 7، ص 160- 137.
-فلاح، حسن، قاضی­نوری، سپهر، رضاییان­فرتوتی، صدیقه و علی­احمدی، علی رضا. (1393). مدلسازی رابطه کارکرد­های مدیریت دانش و شاخص­های عملکرد نظام ملی نوآوری، راهبرد، شماره 71، ص 195- 167.
-ماقبل، روح اله؛ نادری مهدیی، کریم، یعقوبی فرانی، احمد  و محمدی، مهدی. ( 1394). شناسایی و تبیین استلزامات کارکردی نظام نوآوری فناورانه کشاورزی، اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، جلد 31، شماره 3، ص 206- 196.
-ماقبل, روح اله، نادری مهدیی، کریم، یعقوبی فرانی، احمد و محمدی، مهدی. (1395). شناسایی و تبیین موانع اثرگذار بر توسعه نظام نوآوری فناورانه کشاورزی، علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، جلد 12، شماره 1، ص 20- 1.
-نبوی، بهاره؛ ثقفی، فاطمه؛ منطقی، منوچهر و محمدی، مهدی. (1396). شناسایی موانع و چالش­های شکل­گیری توسعه نظام نوآوری در بخش هوانوردی عمومی ایران، مدیریت فردا، سال شانزدهم، ص 312- 297.
-نقی­زاده، محمد؛ اوجانی، مهدی؛ آقاده­زاده، سهراب؛ صفردوست، عاطفه و غفوریان، کامیار. (1395). اولویت‌بندی چالش­های توسعه و موفقیت شرکت­های زایشی در حوزه زیست فناوری، مدیریت نوآوری، سال پنجم، شماره 1، ص 102- 83.
-یوسفی، زهرا، نادری، نادر و رضایی، بیژن. (1395). عوامل مؤثر بر ادامه فعالیت و رشد شرکت­های نوظهور کشاورزی، مدیریت نوآوری، سال پنجم، شماره 4، ص 18- 1.
References
-Ataie M. (2009). Fuzzy multi criteria decision making. Shahrood: University of Technology of shahrud;.
-Borzouei, H., Mirdamadi, M. and Hosseini, J. (2011). Affective factors in commercialization of nanotechnology in Iran’s agricultural sector, Annals of Biological Research, 2 (6), pp. 56- 61.
-Carlsson, B., and Jacobsson, S. (2004). Dynamics of innovation systems – policy-making in a complex and nondeterministic world. International Workshop of Functions in Innovation Systems, Netherlands: University of Utrechtthe.
-Carlsson, B., and Stankievicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems.
- Cozzens, S.E., 2007, Distributive justice in science and technology policy, Science and Public Policy, 34(2), pp. 85-94.
-Cozzens, S.E., Kallerud, E., Ackers, L., Gill, B., Harper, J., Pereira, T. S; Zarb- Adami, N. (2007). Problems of Inequality in Science, Technology, and Innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), 93-118.
-Haghighi, M., Divandari, A., Keimasi, M., (2010). The impact of 3D e-readiness on e-banking development in Iran: A fuzzy AHP analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 4084–4093.
-Hui, Y. T, Bao, H. H & Siou, W (2008) Combining ANP and TOPSIS Concepts for Evaluation the Performance of Property- Liability Insurance Companies. Science Publications, Journal of Social Sciences, 4 (1), Yuanpei University, Taiwan: pp 56-61.
-Jacobsson, S., and Johnson, A. (2000). The diffusion of renewable energy technology: An analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy Policy, 28, 625-640.
-Joseph, K.J., Singh, L., Abraham, V. (2009). In: BRICS project, Brazil, RedeSist - Economics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.
-Kaarela, M., (2013). Challenges of Technology Commercialization, Euro Nanoforum.
-Nassiri-Koopaei, N., Majdzadeh, R., Kebriaeezadeh, A., Rashidian, A., Yazdi, M. T., Nedjat, S., & Nikfar, S. (2014). Commercialization of biopharmaceutical knowledge in Iran; challenges and solutions. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22, 1-11.
-Papaioannou, T., (2011). Technological innovation, global justice and politics of development, Progress in Development Studies, 11(4), pp. 321-338.
-Zaichenko, S., (2008). In, Moskow, Higher School of Economics.
-Purnomo, S. H and Kusnandar. (2018). Barriers to acceptance of information and communication technology in agricultural extension in Indonesia, Information Development, https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666918767484.
-Magruder, J. A. (2018). Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Annual Review of Resource Economics, Vol. 10.
Governance and Development
Volume 2, Issue 3
September 2022
Pages 137-156

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics