Identifying Dimensions and Components of Stakeholders' Participation in Collaborative Governance of Iran's pension funds

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD. Student, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty member of Allameh Tabatabaei University

3 Faculty member of Allameh Tabatabai University

4 Associate Professor of Public Administration Department, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabaei University

Abstract

Stakeholders are a group of people who, on the one hand, have the power to influence decisions, planning and all actions, and on the other hand, they also have interests and effectiveness. In present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the dimensions and components of stakeholders' participation in collaborative governance, especially in the country's pension funds. For this purpose, qualitative research approach and research synthesis method were used to achieve the goal of the present research. The scope of the research is all the articles that have been presented in the last five years about the components of stakeholder participation in cooperative governance and related concepts in specialized and scientific databases. The sample of the research is 27 articles, which have been selected based on thematic monitoring, theoretical data saturation and purposefully. The research data were collected from the qualitative analysis of the studied documents. By analyzing the data, indicators and components of stakeholders' participation in collaborative governance in five selected codes and eleven axes of foundational factors (including value-creating components for stakeholders, institutionalization of the culture of participation and common vision), binding factors (including strategies and requirements, structural measures and management approach) and facilitating factors (including incentives, clarification and networking) and incentives (including convergence of stakeholders and targeted participation) were organized.

Keywords

References

  1. منابع

    1. آریانا، اندیشه؛ کاظمیان، غلامرضا و محمدی، محمود (1399). مدل مدیریت تعارض ذی‏نفعان بازآفرینی شهری در ایران (مورد مطالعه: محله همت‌آباد اصفهان)، فصلنامه مطالعات شهری، 9(35)، 117-132.
    2. ابراهیم نژاد، علی و کریمی، مهتاب (1397). چالش حکمرانی در صندوق‏های بازنشستگی، فصلنامه تأمین اجتماعی، (4)13، 91-104.
    3. امیرپور، علیرضا؛ فلاح زاده، علی محمد؛ برزگر، عبدالرضا و نجفی خواه، محسن (1398). کارکرد سه‌جانبه‌گرایی در تأمین اجتماعی و نقش آن در توسعه شاخص‏های حکمرانی خوب. فصلنامه تخصصی علوم سیاسی، 15(48)، 157-179.
    4. باقری، یاسر؛ عباسی دره بیدی، ابوالفضل و نامغ، منوچهر (1399). اظهارنظر کارشناسی درباره: «طرح اعمال سه‌جانبه‌گرایی در ارکان عالی سازمان تأمین اجتماعی». تهران، ایران: مرکز پژوهش‏های مجلس شورای اسلامی.
    5. براتلو، فاطمه (1402). شناخت چارچوب مفهومی حکمرانی سازمانی با استفاده از روش فراترکیب. حکمرانی و توسعه، 3(1)، 121-144.
    6. بیانچی، کارمین؛ ناسی، گرتا، ناسی و سی ریونبارک، ویلیام (۱۴۰۱). اجرای حکمرانی مشارکتی: مدل‌ها، تجربیات و چالش‌ها (نیلوفر عظیمی، ناهید کلهر و نوید دادگر، مترجمان). مطالعات و پژوهش‌های اداری، ۴(۱۴)، 116- ۱۲۳.
    7. سالاری، سلمان؛ رحیم نیا، فریبرز؛ خوراکیان، علی رضا؛ مرتضوی، سعید و اسلامی، قاسم (1400). کشف اصول حکمرانی سازمانی در سازمان‌های عام‌‌المنفعه ‌ایرانی. حکمرانی و توسعه، 1(4)، 37-72.
    8. شمس، فاطمه (۱۴۰۲). تدوین الگوی نقش آفرینی نهاد دانشگاه در چارچوب حکمرانی همکارانه. فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی رفاه و توسعه اجتماعی، ۱۴(۵۶)، 1-32.
    9. شمس، فاطمه؛ حسین پور، داود؛ واعظی، رضا و اصلی‌پور، حسین (۱۴۰۱). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی پیشایندها و پسایندهای نقش‌آفرینی نهاد دانشگاه در چارچوب حکمرانی همکارانه. مطالعات مدیریت دولتی ایران، 6(1)، 39-72.
    10. عبدالحمید، مهدی؛ نعمت‌اللهی، حمیدرضا و عبدالحسین‌زاده، محمد (۱۴۰۱). دستاوردها و کارکردهای رویکرد مدیریت مشارکتی در نظام آموزش عالی. آموزش عالی ایران، ۱۴(۱)، 1-23.
    11. عزتی آراسته، فائزه؛ علی احمدی، علیرضا؛ پیشوایی، میرسامان و پارسانژاد، محمدرضا (1402). شناسایی و تحلیل عرصه‏ها و مضامین شکل‌دهنده نوآوری اجتماعی با استفاده از رویکرد فراتلفیق. نشریه علمی مدیریت نوآوری، 12(2)، 149-194.
    12. فتحی، عاطفه (1401). فراترکیب علامت‌دهی مؤثر به ذی‏نفعان درونی و بیرونی. فصلنامه مدیریت راهبردی، 13(50)، 105- 134.
    13. معصومی، علی اکبر (1400). مشکلات ساختاری صندوق‌های بازنشستگی در نظام تأمین اجتماعی ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، 51(1)، 409-429.
    14. موسوی، میرطاهر؛ هندی، حمیدرضا و جغتایی، فائزه (1399). حکمرانی شایسته: مشارکت ذی‏نفعان در فعالیت‌های صندوق بازنشستگی کشوری؛ مفاهیم، نظریه‌ها، مدل. فصلنامه تأمین اجتماعی، 16(4)، 214-221.
    15. میرباقری، سید محسن؛ رفیعی آتانی، عطاءالله و پارسانژاد، محمدرضا (۱۴۰۱). طراحی الگوی مفهومی حکمرانی مشارکتی در ایران: رویکرد داده بنیاد. فصلنامه علمی راهبرد، ۳۱(۲)، 195- ۲۱۸.
    16. نجفی‌زاده، مهدیه؛ ربیعی، علی و فرهنگی، علی اکبر (1400). ارائه الگوی مدیریت ذی‏نفعان سازمان‌های مردم‌نهاد در رسانه‌های اجتماعی. مطالعات راهبردی سیاست‌گذاری عمومی، 11(39)، 110-133.
    17. نعمت‌الهی، حمیدرضا؛ احمدی، حیدر و اسدالهی دهکردی، الهه (۱۴۰۱). پدیدارشناسی موانع اجرای حکمرانی مشارکتی در نهادهای آموزشی و پژوهشی، مطالعات راهبردی سیاست‌گذاری عمومی، 12(44)، 164-189.
    18. واعظی، رضا و قیطرانی، فاطمه (۱۳۹۸). حکمرانی همکارانه؛ رویکردی نو در مدیریت ارزش عمومی. مجله توسعه علوم انسانی، ۱(۲)، ۶۱.

    References

    1. Abdolhamid, M., Nematallahi, H. & Abdolhoseinzade, M. (2022). Achievements and functions of participatory management approach in higher education system. Iran's higher education, 14(1), 1-23. http://ihej.ir/article-1787-1-fa.html (in Persian)
    2. Akomea-Frimpong, I., Tenakwah, E. S., Tenakwah, E. J. & Amponsah, M. (2022). Corporate governance and performance of pension funds in Ghana: A mixed-method study. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10030052.
    3. Amirpoor, A., Fallahzade, A., Barzegar, A. & Najafikhah, M. (2019). The function of Tripartism in social security and its role in the development of good governance indicators. Specialized Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 15(48), 157-179. (in Persian)
    4. Ariana, A., Kazemian, G. & Mohammadi, M. (2020). Conflict management model of urban regeneration stakeholders in Iran (Case study: Hemmat-abad neighborhood of Isfahan). Motaleate Shahri, 9(35), 117-132. https://doi:10.34785/J011.2021.197 (in Persian)
    5. Arianti, R. D. L. (2019). Penerapan Prinsip Good Pension Fund Governance Pada Pedoman Tata Kelola Dana Pensiun Ditinjau Dari Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 16/Pojk. 05/2016 (Studi Di Dana Pensiun Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang). https://doi.org/10.36987/ebma.v4i1.4635
    6. Babar, M.I., Ghazali, M. & Jawawi, D.N. (2014). A Bi-metric and Fuzzy c- means Based Intelligent Stakeholder Quantification System for Value-based Software. In New Trends in software methodologies, tools & Technique, 295-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-434-3-295
    7. Bagheri, Y., Darre bidi, A. & Namegh, M. (2020). Expert opinion on: The plan to implement tripartism in the higher pillars of the Social Security Organization. Islamic Council Research Center. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/download/1521628 (in Persian)
    8. Ballesteros, M. & Dickey-Collas, M. (2023). Managing participation across boundaries: a typology for stakeholder engagement in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Marine Policy, 147(1), 105389.
    9. Baratlo, F. (2023). Understanding the Conseptual Framework of the Organizational Governance Using Meta Synthesis Method. Governance and Development Journal, 3(1), 121-144. https://doi:22111/jipaa.2023.384434.1095 (in Persian)
    10. Bayanchi, K., Nancy, G. & Rionbark, V. (2022). Implementing participatory governance: models, experiences and challenges. (Nilofar Azimi, Nahid Kalhor & Navid Dadgar, Trans.). Administrative studies and researches, 4(14), 116-123. https://jasr.smtc.ac.ir (in Persian)
    11. Birch, J. & Hart, J. (2018). Social networks and northern Iroquoian confederacy dynamics. American Antiquity, 83(1), 13-33. doi:10.1017/aaq.2017.59
    12. Birendra, K. C., Dhungana, A. & Dangi, T. B. (2021). Tourism and the sustainable development goals: Stakeholders' perspectives from Nepal. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100822
    13. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T. & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis.
    14. Braun, R., Starkbaum, J. (2023). Stakeholders in Research and Innovation: Towards Responsible Governance. In: Blok, V. (eds) Putting Responsible Research and Innovation into Practice. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, vol 40. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14710-4_12
    15. Bregnard, N. & Salva, C. (2023). Pension fund board governance and asset allocation: evidence from Switzerland. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 22(3), 400-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747221000494
    16. Duan, Y., Jiao, Y. & Tam, K. (2018). The role of public pension funds in corporate governance: Evidence from proxy voting. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(2), 489-513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109016000181
    17. Ebrahimnezhad, A. & Karimi, M. (2018). The challenge of governance in pension funds. Social Security Quarterly. 13(4), 91-104. https://qjo.ssor.ir/article_83508_211a09456418021a7b53a65365c7b4a6.pdf. (in Persian)
    18. Edwards, J. & Kaimal, G. (2016). Using Meta-Synthesis to Support Application of Qualitative Methods Findings in Practice: A Discussion of Meta-Ethnography, Narrative Synthesis, and Critical Interpretive Synthesis. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 51, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2016.07.003
    19. Enoos, Z. (2021). Corporate governance failures in South Africa: Are pension funds next? http://hdl.handle.net/11394/8825
    20. Ezzati Arasteh, F., Aliahmadi, A., Pishvaee, M. & Parsanejad, M. (2023). Identifying and Analyzing Fields and Themes of Social Innovation on Meta synthesis approach. Innovation Management Journal, 12(2), 149-194. 22034/imj.2024.399096.2714 (in Persian)
    21. Fathi, A. (2022). Integrating effective signaling to internal and external stakeholders. Strategic Management Quarterly, 13(50), 105-134. https://doi:10.22034/smsj.2022.152228 (in Persian)
    22. Frankowski, A. (2019). Collaborative governance as a policy strategy in healthcare. Journal of health organization and management, 33(7/8), 791-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-10-2018-0313
    23. Gash, A. (2022). Collaborative Governance. In Handbook on Theories of Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, p 497-509. 10.4337/9781800371972
    24. Higgins, J. P. T. & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539-1558.
    25. Impayudo, G. (2002). World Bank Perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    26. Jara, M., López-Iturriaga, F., San Martín, P., Saona, P. & Tenderini, G. (2019). Chilean pension fund managers and corporate governance: The impact on corporate debt. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48, 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.02.012
    27. Katsonis, M. (2019). Designing effective public engagement: the case study of Future Melbourne 2026. Policy Design and Practice, 2(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1621032
    28. Khan, N. U., & Han, H. (2023). Linking Local Collaborative Governance and Public Service Delivery: Mediating Role of Institutional Capacity Building. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,10(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02421-3
    29. Kruijf, J. & Verhoeven, M. (2014). Governance and Stakeholder Participation in the Netherlands Pension Industry: Lessons for Developing Countries. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 13(4), 412-430.
    30. Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A. & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder engagement: Past, present, and future. Business & Society, 61(5), 1136-1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211066595
    31. Marzec, M. & Szczudlińska-Kanoś, A. (2018). The levels of trust in the pension system: a Polish perspective. Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społecznego Studia i Prace, 4 (36), 141-159. https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/kwes/article/view/1318
    32. Masoomi, A. (2021). Structural problems of pension funds in Iran's social security system. Tehran University Public Law Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 409-429. doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2019.251226.1662 (in Persian)
    33. Matkin, D. S., Chen, G. & Khalid, H. (2019). The governance of public pensions: an institutional framework. Administration & Society, 51(1), 91-119. http://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715621945
    34. Miller, J. (2002). The Board as a Monitor of Organizational Activity: The Applicability of Agency Theory to Nonprofit Boards. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(4), 429–450.
    35. Mir Bagheri, M., Rafiei Atani, A. & Parsanezhad, M. (2022). Designing a conceptual model of participatory governance in Iran: the Foundation's data approach. Scientific Quarterly of Strategy, 31(2), 195-218. https://doi.org/10.22034/rahbord.2022.157936 (in Persian)
    36. Momo, E. S. L. & Mogga, M. L. (2023). The Republic of South Sudan Pension Funds Governance: An Analysis of Framework, Challenges, and Solutions. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 7, 78-96. https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2023.7307
    37. Moosavi, M., Hendi, H. & Joghataei, F. (2020). Decent governance: participation of stakeholders in the activities of the national pension fund; Concepts, theories, models. Social Security Quarterly, 16(4), 214-221. https://qjo.ssor.ir/article_141887.html. (in Persian)
    38. Muntalima, N. C., Silumbwe, A., Zulu, J. M., Mweemba, C. & Hangoma, P. (2023). Collaborative governance of an integrated system for collecting contributions for social health insurance, pension, and taxes from the informal sector: A synthesis of stakeholder perspectives. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3697112/v1
    39. Najafizade, M., Rabiei, A. & Fahangi, A. (2021). Presenting the model of stakeholder management of non-governmental organizations in social media. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 11(39), 110-133. (in Persian)
    40. Nematollahi, H., Ahmadi, H. & Asadallahi, E. (2022). Phenomenology of barriers to the implementation of participatory governance in educational and research institutions”, Strategic studies of public policy, 12(44), 164-189. https://doi:10.22034/sspp.2022.553544.3193
      (in Persian)
    41. Okoli, C. & Schabram, K. (2010). A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824
    42. Ortiz, I., Duran, F., Urban, S., Wodsak, V. & Yu, Z. (2018). Reversing pension privatization: Rebuilding public pension systems in Eastern European and Latin American countries (2000-18). Available at SSRN 3275228. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3275228
    43. Palumbo, R. (2017). Participatory Governance. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–6. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1834-1 
    44. Pinkus, D. (2023). Pension Fund Investment: Implications for the Real Economy. (Doctoral dissertation, Copenhagen Business School). PhD Series No. 21.2023.
    45. Polat, S. & AY, O. (2016). Meta-synthesis: A Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c2s3m
    46. Rahman, I.K.A., Hussain, M.D. & Hossin, M.S. (2019). Microfinance governance: A multi-theoretical approach for ascertaining the wider stakeholder influencing forces. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24, 203-216. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2019.24.s1.14
    47. Rosete, N. L., Arana-Somuhano, N. P. & Guevara-Romero, M. L. (2019). Participative management model for humanizing public spaces. Analco neighborhood, Puebla, México. Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 29(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.15446/bitacora.v29n1.60361
    48. Sachs, S. & Kujala, J. (2021). Stakeholder engagement in management studies: Current and future debates. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.321
    49. Salari, S., Rahimnia, F., Khorakian, A., Mortazavi, S. & Eslami, G. (2021). Discovering the Principles of Organizational governance in Iranian non-profit Organizations. Governance and Development Journal, 1(4), 37-72. https://doi:10.22111/jipaa.2021.154559 (in Persian)
    50. Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J. & Voils, C. I. (2007). Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Research in nursing & health, 30(1), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20176
    51. Shams, F. (2022). Elaborating the role-playing model of the university institution in the framework of cooperative governance”, Welfare and Social Development Planning Quarterly, 14(56), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2022.68426.2368 (in Persian)
    52. Shams, F., Hoseinpoor, D., Vaezi, R. & Aslipoor, H. (2021). Identifying and prioritizing the antecedents and consequences of the role of the university institution in the framework of collaborative governance. Iranian public administration studies, 6(1), 39-72. https://doi:10.22034/jipas.2022.354295.1448 (in Persian)
    53. Siddiki, S., Leach, W. D., & Kim, J. (2017). Diversity, Trust, and Social Learning in Collaborative Governance. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 863–874.
    54. Sim, J. & Mengshoel, A. M. (2023). Metasynthesis: issues of empirical and theoretical context. Quality & Quantity,57(4), 3339-3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01502-w
    55. Sonza, I. B. & Granzotto, A. (2018). Are pension funds good monitors? RAUSP Management Journal, 53, 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rauspm.2017.06.003
    56. Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2021). Radical and Disruptive Answers to Downstream Problems in Collaborative Governance? Public Management Review, 23(11), 1590–1610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1879914
    57. Spadaro, I. & Pirlone, F. (2023). Stakeholder Participation in Planning of a Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Destination: The Genoa Integrated Action Plan. Sustainability, 15(6), 5005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065005
    58. Stewart, F. & Yermo, J. (2009). Pension fund governance: Challenges and potential solutions. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends,2008(2), 1-42. http://doi.10.1787/241402256531Strumskis, M., & Balkevičius, A. (2016). Pension fund participants and fund managing company shareholder relations in Lithuania second pillar pension funds. Intellectual Economics, 10(1), 1-12.
    59. Vaezi, R., Gheytarani, F. (2019). Collaborative governance; A new approach in public value management’, Humanities Development Journal, 1(2), 61. 22047/HSD.2019.182454 (in Persian)
    60. Xu, G., Liu, F.-C., Hsu, H.-T. & Lin, J.W. (2019). The impact of pension governance practices on the public defined benefit pension performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(1), 192-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2018-0265
    61. Zaenuri, M. (2023). From Participatory Governance to Collaborative Governance for Disaster-Tourism. Sociología Y Tecnociencia, 13(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.1.2023.6-25
Governance and Development
Volume 4, Issue 3
September 2024
Pages 111-150

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics