طراحی مدل حکمرانی چند سطحی در سازمان‌های پیچیده مبتنی بر نظریه داده بنیاد و فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت سیستم، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران،

2 استادیار، گروه تحول و تعالی، دانشکده مدیریت و برنامه ریزی راهبردی، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و برنامه ریزی راهبردی، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران.

4 استادیار، گروه مدیریت سیستم، دانشکده مدیریت و برنامه ریزی راهبردی، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف:
حکمرانی چند سطحی برای تحقق چشم‌انداز و اهداف سازمان‏های پیچیده امروزی ضروری است، لذا هدف از این پژوهش، ارائه مدل حکمرانی چند سطحی در سازمان‌های پیچیده با استفاده از فراترکیب پژوهش‌های موجود مبتنی بر نظریه داده بنیاد پیشنهادی اشتراوس و کوربین است.
روش:
پژوهش حاضر از نوع توسعه‌ای بوده و با استفاده از روش فراترکیب و نظریه داده‌بنیاد انجام شده است. برای این منظور، ابتدا از روش هفت مرحله‌ای فراترکیب که توسط سندلوسکی و باروسو پیشنهاد شده، بهره‌گیری شده است. درمجموع، 67 منبع برای انجام فراترکیب نهایی انتخاب گردید که از آن‌ها، 194 مفهوم اولیه، 43 مقوله فرعی و 20 مقوله اصلی استخراج شده و در گام دوم، مدل نهایی مبتنی بر نظریه داده‌بنیاد ارائه گردید.
یافته‌ها:
یافته‌ها نشان داد که مؤلفه‌های پیچیدگی موضوعی، سیاستی و ساختاری به‌عنوان عوامل علی، مؤلفه قفل به مسیر قبلی و ضعف هماهنگی بین بخشی به‌عنوان عوامل زمینه‌ای، مؤلفه‌های توافق ذی‌نفعان و فراهم بودن زیرساخت به‌عنوان عوامل مداخله‌گر، مؤلفه‌های مشارکت ذی‌نفعان، اقدام مبتنی بر شواهد، بازمهندسی ساختارها و فرایندها به‌عنوان راهبردها و مؤلفه‌های دستیابی تمام ذی‌نفعان به منافع، قابلیت شناخت تغییرات محیطی و مشروعیت از جمله نتایج و پیامدهای حاصل از حکمرانی چند سطحی در سازمان‌های پیچیده هستند.
نتیجه‌گیری:
طبق مدل به‌دست‌آمده، به‌منظور توسعه حکمرانی چند سطحی مطلوب در سازمان‌های پیچیده استفاده از مؤلفه‌های معرفی‌شده این پژوهش می‌تواند مؤثر باشد و با پیاده‌سازی آن‌ها تحقق دستیابی تمام ذی‌نفعان به منافع، قابلیت شناخت تغییرات محیطی، حل تعارضات بین بخشی، شفافیت، مشارکت و مشروعیت، بهبود فرایند تحقق چشم‌انداز و اهداف سازمان قابل‌انتظار است.

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a Multi-Level Governance Model in Complex Organizations Based on Grounded Theory and Meta-Synthesis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bahman Ebrahimian 1
  • ALI Taheri 2
  • Seyed abed Rezaee 3
  • Mohsen Miri 4
  • MohammadMahdi Mohtadi 4
1 PhD. Candidate, Department of System Management, Imam Hossein Comprehensive University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Faculty of Management and Strategic Planning.
3 Assistant Professor of Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Faculty of Management and Strategic Planning.
4 Assistant Professor of Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Faculty of Management and Strategic Planning.
چکیده [English]

Objective:
Multilevel governance is essential for achieving the vision and goals of today’s complex organizations. Therefore, the aim of this research is to present a multilevel governance model for complex organizations using a meta-synthesis of existing research based on the grounded theory proposed by Strauss and Corbin.
Methods:
This research is developmental in nature and employs meta-synthesis and grounded theory methodologies. Initially, the seven-step meta-synthesis approach suggested by Sandelowski and Barroso was utilized. In total, 67 sources were selected for the final meta-synthesis, from which 194 initial concepts, 43 sub-categories, and 20 main categories were extracted. In the second step, a final model based on grounded theory was presented.
Results:
The findings indicated that components of subject complexity, policy, and structure act as causal factors, while route lock and poor inter-departmental coordination serve as contextual factors. Stakeholder agreement and infrastructure availability were identified as intervening factors. Strategies included stakeholder participation, evidence-based actions, and re-engineering structures and processes. Components leading to all stakeholders accessing benefits, the capability to recognize environmental changes, and legitimacy are among the results and outcomes derived from multilevel governance in complex organizations.
Conclusion:
According to the derived model, utilizing the components introduced in this research can effectively promote desirable multilevel governance in complex organizations. Implementing these components is expected to enhance stakeholder benefit realization, the ability to recognize environmental changes, resolution of inter-departmental conflicts, transparency, participation, and legitimacy, thereby improving the process of achieving the organization’s vision and goals.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Complex organizations
  • multi-level governance
  • meta-synthesis
  • grounded theory

مراجع

  1. منابع

    1. اشتریان، کیومرث و قائمی اصل، باقر. (1399). مدل سیاست‌گذاری مشارکتی چند سطحی. فصلنامه سیاست، 50(2)، 423-446.
    2. اکبری، زهرا، حکاک، محمد، وحدتی، حجت اله و نظرپوری، هوشنگ. (1398). طراحی الگوی سه شاخگی حکمرانی خوب در سازمان‌های چند سطحی. مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی، 10(40 )، 175-201.
    3. الوانی، مهدی و حسن دانایی فرد (1388)، تئوری نظم در بی نظمی در مدیریت، تهران، صفار.
    4. براتلو، فاطمه. (1402). شناخت چارچوب مفهومی حکمرانی سازمانی با استفاده از روش فراترکیب. حکمرانی و توسعه, 3(1)، 121-144.
    5. بوستان زر، جمال، رحمان سرشت، حسین، شریف زاده، فتاح و تقوی فرد، محمد تقی. (1401). مدل اجرای هوشمند خط‌مشی‌های عمومی در سازمان‌های دولتی :مطالعه ای با روش داده بنیاد. فصلنامه انجمن علوم مدیریت ایران، 17(65)، 29-51.
    6. سیمایی چافی، حسین و معمارزاده طهران، غلامرضا. (1401). طراحی مدل ظرفیت سازی حکمرانی شبکه ای. فرآیند مدیریت و توسعه، 35(1 (119) )، 27-62.
    7. فاروق خسروی، محمد، مصدق راد، علی محمد و عرب، محمد. (1400). حکمرانی در نظام سلامت: یک مرور مفهومی. تحقیقات نظام سلامت حکیم، 24(92)، 35-54.
    8. دستوم، صلاح، رمضانی نژاد، رحیم و صادقی بروجردی، سعید. (1399). ارائه الگوی مارپیچ چهارگانه دولت، دانشگاه، صنعت و جامعه برای توسعه اقتصاد دانش بنیان در ورزش کشور. علوم مدیریت ایران، 15(58)، 81-107.
    9. روستایی حسین آبادی، یاسر، (1402). قانون اساسی ایران و سیاست‌گذاری چند سطحی (نقدی بر نظام حقوقی تعیین مسئله عمومی در ایران)، فصلنامه دولت پژوهی، 9(33)، 113-136.
    10. ستوده فر، سلیمه، پارسا، عبداله، شاهی، سکینه و فرهادی راد، حمید. (1398). الگوپردازی بین‌المللی سازی دانشگاه ها با تأکید بر حکمرانی چند سطحی: رویکرد کیفی. پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی، 11(4)، ۴۵-۵۵.
    11. صالحی نودز، اسما و یعقوبی، نور محمد. (1402). طراحی الگوی دولت باز با استفاده از رویکرد فراترکیب. حکمرانی و توسعه، 3(3)، 65-78.
    12. صرافی، مظفر و نجاتی، ناصر. (1396). حکمروایی چند سطحی منطقه‌ی کلان‌شهری در راستای رویکرد نومنطقه گرایی (مطالعه موردی: منطقه کلانشهری مشهد). هویت شهر، 11(3)، 27-39.
    13. علیزاده، مهدی؛ قلیپور، رحمتاله؛ ابویی، محمد؛ پیراننژاد، علی و فاضلی، محمد. طراحی الگوی حکمرانی پیچیده در شرایط تحریم در ایران (موردمطالعه: صنعت برق). مدیریت دولتی، 13 (1)، 56-79.
    14. علوی، سید مهدی. (2022). اقتصاد زیستی: پارادایم اقتصادی جدید در عصر چالش ها و پیچیدگی های جهانی مجله زیست شناسی ایران، 6(11)، 1-25.

    References

    1. Ajeeb, D. (2023). Multi-Level Governance Framework for Global Political Renewal. In The Global Council for Political Renewal Conference. London 14 - 15 Apr 2023.
    2. Akse, R. Veeneman, W. Marchau, V. & Ritter, S. (2023). Governance of uncertainty in implementing mobility innovations: A comparison of two Dutch cases. Research in Transportation Economics, 34(1), 101-128.
    3. Allain-Dupré, D. (2020). The multi-level governance imperative. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 800-808.
    4. Alnoor, A. Khaw, K. W. Chew, X. Abbas, S. & Khattak, Z. Z. (2023). The influence of the barriers of hybrid strategy on strategic competitive priorities: evidence from oil companies. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(2), 179-198.
    5. AlNuaimi, B. K. Singh, S. K. Ren, S. Budhwar, P. & Vorobyev, D. (2022). Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636-648.
    6. Angst, M. (2020). Bottom‐Up identification of subsystems in complex governance systems. Policy studies journal, 48(3), 782-805.
    7. Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public AdministrationResearchandTheory:J-PART,18(4),543–71.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25096384
    8. Aristovnik, A. Murko, E. & Ravšelj, D. (2022). From neo-Weberian to hybrid governance models in public administration: Differences between state and local self-government. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 1-26.
    9. Bache, I. Bartle, I. & Flinders, M. (2016). Multi-level governance. In Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 486-498). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Basile, V., Loia, F., Capobianco, N., & Vona, R. (2023). An ecosystems perspective on the reconversion of offshore platforms: Towards a multi‐level governance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1615-1631.‏.
    11. Behnke, N., & Hegele, Y. (2024). Achieving cross‐sectoral policy integration in multilevel structures—Loosely coupled coordination of “energy transition” in the German “Bundesrat”. Review of Policy Research, 41(1), 160-183.‏
    12. Bianchi, S. & Richiedei, A. (2023). Territorial Governance for Sustainable Development: A multi-level governance analysis in the Italian context. Sustainability, 15(3), 1-28.
    13. Bolton, M. (2022). A system leverage points approach to governance for sustainable development. Sustainability Science, 17(6), 2427-2457.
    14. Börzel, T. A. (2020). Multilevel governance or multilevel government? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 776-783.
    15. Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses. Public Administration, 101(1), 3-22.‏
    16. Briassoulis, H. (2004). Policy integration for complex policy problems: What, why and how. Greening of Policies: Interlinkages and Policy Integration, Berlin, 3-4.‏
    17. Brugnone, N. (2023). A Methodology for Modeling Emergence in Complex Systems. Michigan State University.‏
    18. Castañer, X. & Oliveira, N. (2020). Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Among Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Management, 46(6), 965-1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901565
    19. Catalano, A. (2013). Patterns of Graduate Students' Information Seeking Behavior: A Metasynthesis of The Literature. Journal of Documentation, (69)2, 243-274
    20. Brugnone, N. (2023). A Methodology for Modeling Emergence in Complex Systems. Michigan State University.‏
    21. Chester, M. Underwood, B. S. Allenby, B. Garcia, M. Samaras, C. Markolf, S. & Miller, T. R. (2021). Infrastructure resilience to navigate increasingly uncertain and complex conditions in the Anthropocene. Npj Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 1-6.
    22. Chowdhury, S. Dey, P. Joel-Edgar, S. Bhattacharya, S. Rodriguez-Espindola, O. Abadie, A. & Truong, L. (2023). Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 1-43.
    23. Ciasullo, M. V., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M., & Leone, D. (2020). Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 1167-1195.
    24. Conteh, C. & Harding, B. (2023). Boundary-spanning in public value co-creation through the lens of multilevel governance. Public Management Review, 25(1), 104-128.
    25. Craig, R. K., Garmestani, A. S., Allen, C. R., Arnold, C. A. T., Birgé, H., DeCaro, D. A., ... & Schlager, E. (2017). Balancing stability and flexibility in adaptive governance: an analysis of tools available in US environmental law. Ecology and society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, 22(2), 1-15.‏
    26. Daniell, K., & Kay, A. (2018). Multi-level governance: conceptual challenges and case studies from Australia (p. 474). ANU Press.
    27. Dominici, P. (2022). Human hypercomplexity. Error and unpredictability in complex multichaotic social systems. In Multi-Chaos, Fractal and Multi-Fractional Artificial Intelligence of Different Complex Systems (pp. 77-93). Academic Press.
    28. Dosi, G. (2023). The Foundations of Complex Evolving Economies: Part One: Innovation, Organization, and Industrial Dynamics. Oxford University Press.
    29. Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business research, 13(1), 215-246.
    30. Ekici, A. & Ekici, Ş. Ö. (2021). Understanding and managing complexity through Bayesian network approach: The case of bribery in business transactions. Journal of Business Research, 129, 757-773.
    31. Errida, A. & Lotfi, B. (2021). The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, (13), 1-15.
    32. Farrell, M. Hettne, B. & Van Langenhove, L. (2021). GLOBAL POLITICS OF REGIONALISM Theory and Practice.
    33. Franklin, A. L. & Raadschelders, J. C. (2023). Governance Through Government and Public Administration: Is Governance A Nuisance, a Necessity, or a Blessing? In Introduction to Governance, Government and Public Administration (pp. 11-33). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
    34. Ghasemyani, S. Raoofi, S. Hamidi, H. & Khodayari-Zarnaq, R. (2022). Iran’s Health Transformation Plan; Main Issues and Opportunities for Improvement: A Systematic Review. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 51(9), 46-69.
    35. Giraudy, A. & Niedzwiecki, S. (2022). Multi-level governance and subnational research: Similarities, differences, and knowledge accumulation in the study of territorial politics. Regional & Federal Studies, 32(3), 393-411.
    36. Große, C. (2023). A review of the foundations of systems, infrastructure and governance. Safety science, 36(8), 106-129.
    37. Hallo, L., Nguyen, T., Gorod, A., & Tran, P. (2020). Effectiveness of leadership decision-making in complex systems. Systems, 8(1), 1-21.
    38. He, A.J. Fan, Y. & Su, R.(2022) Seeking policy solutions in a complex system: experimentalist governance in China’s healthcare reform. Policy Sci 55, 755–776.
    39. Head, B. W. (2022). Wicked problems in public policy: understanding and responding to complex challenges (p. 176). Springer Nature.
    40. Heinen, D. Arlati, A. & Knieling, J. (2022). Five dimensions of climate governance: a framework for empirical research based on polycentric and multi‐level governance perspectives. Environmental policy and governance, 32(1), 56-68.
    41. Helfgott, A. Midgley, G. Chaudhury, A. Vervoort, J. Sova, C. & Ryan, A. (2023). Multi-level participation in integrative, systemic planning: The case of climate adaptation in Ghana. European Journal of Operational Research, 309(3), 1201-1217.
    42. Hidalgo, C. A. (2021). Economic complexity theory and applications. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(2), 92-113.
    43. Hiller, N. J. & Ozgen, S. (2023). Organizational agility and organizational effectiveness. In Senior leadership teams and the agile organization (pp. 24-43). Routledge.
    44. Hirschhorn, F. (2021). A multi-level governance response to the Covid-19 crisis in public transport. Transport Policy, 112, 13-21.
    45. Hong, S., & Lee, S. (2018). Adaptive governance and decentralization: Evidence from regulation of the sharing economy in multi-level governance. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 299-305.
    46. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2021). Multilevel governance and the coordination dilemma. In A research agenda for multilevel governance (pp. 19-36). Edward Elgar Publishing.‏
    47. Jhaver, S., Frey, S., & Zhang, A. (2021). Designing for multiple centers of power: A Taxonomy of multi-level governance in online social platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv, 25(6), 1-24.
    48. Jeffery, C. & Peterson, J. (2020). ‘Breakthrough’political science: Multi-level governance–Reconceptualising Europe’s modernised polity. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 753-766.
    49. Katina, P. F., Pyne, J. C., Keating, C. B., & Komljenovic, D. (2021). Complex system governance as a framework for asset management. Sustainability, 13(15), 1-17.‏
    50. Katina, P. F. Tolk, A. Keating, C. B. & Joiner, K. F. (2020). Modelling and simulation in complex system governance. International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, 10(3), 262-292.
    51. Keating, C. B., Katina, P. F., Jaradat, R. E., Bradley, J. M., & Gheorghe, A. V. (2017, July). Acquisition system development: A complex system governance perspective. In INCOSE international symposium (Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 811-825).‏
    52. Keating, C. B. (2022). Complex System Governance. In Complex System Governance: Theory and Practice (pp. 151-186). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    53. Keating, C. B. & Katina, P. F. (2019). Complex system governance: Concept, utility, and challenges. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(5), 687-705.
    54. Khaw, K. W., Alnoor, A., Al-Abrrow, H., Tiberius, V., Ganesan, Y., & Atshan, N. A. (2023). Reactions towards organizational change: a systematic literature review. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19137-19160.‏
    55. Kleider, H. (2020). Multilevel governance: Identity, political contestation, and policy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 792-799.
    56. Kohler-Koch, B. & Larat, F. (2009). European multi-level governance. Contrasting Images in National Research.
    57. Lennon, E. Hopkins, L. Einboden, R. McCloughen, A. Dawson, L. & Buus, N. (2023). Organizational change in complex systems: organizational and leadership factors in the introduction of open dialogue to mental health care services. Community Mental Health Journal, 59(1), 95-104.
    58. Lincoln, B. G. (2023). Who is Best Placed to Make What Decisions? Multilevel Governance and Adaptation to Climate Change-Some Observations from South Australia (Doctoral dissertation).
    59. Maggetti, M. & Trein, P. (2019). Multilevel governance and problem‐solving: Towards a dynamic theory of multilevel policy‐making? Public Administration, 97(2), 355-369.
    60. Maillet, L. Lamarche, P. A. Lemire, M. & Roy, B. (2023). Journey through the fractalization of multilevel governance: levers for adapt healthcare organizations toward migrant populations in Canada. Health Services Insights,28(6), 1-24.
    61. Mărcuț, M. Multilevel Governance, Digital Transformation and Transformation of the State. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mirela-arcut/publication/353515083_Multilevel_Governance_ Digital_Transformation_and_Transformation_of_the_State/links/61013dbf1e95fe241a922314/Multilevel-Governance-Digital-Transformation-and-Transformation-of-the-State. pdf.‏
    62. May, C. K. (2022). Complex adaptive governance systems: a framework to understand institutions, organizations, and people in socio-ecological systems. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 4(1), 39-54.
    63. Melica, G. Bertoldi, P. Kona, A. Iancu, A. Rivas, S. & Zancanella, P. (2018). Multilevel governance of sustainable energy policies: The role of regions and provinces to support the participation of small local authorities in the Covenant of Mayors. Sustainable cities and society, 39(7), 729-739.
    64. Miceli, A. Hagen, B. Riccardi, M. P. Sotti, F. & Settembre-Blundo, D. (2021). Thriving, not just surviving in changing times: How sustainability, agility and digitalization intertwine with organizational resilience. Sustainability, 13(4), 2052.
    65. Modak, M., Pathak, K., & Ghosh, K. K. (2023). Factors influencing sustainable outsourcing relationship: An empirical investigation into the Indian coal mining industry. IIMB Management Review, 35(3), 267-285.‏
    66. Müller, R., Alix-Séguin, C., Alonderienė, R., Bourgault, M., Chmieliauskas, A., Drouin, N., ... & Zhu, F. (2024). A (meta) governance framework for multi-level governance of inter-organizational project networks. Production Planning & Control, 35(10), 1043-1062.‏
    67. Ojiako, U., Bititci, U., Marshall, A., Chipulu, M., Manville, G., Muthalagu, S. J., & Farrington, T. (2023). Ambiguity in performance management systems of complex multi-stakeholder organisations. Production Planning & Control, 34(14), 1393-1413.‏
    68. Omodei, E. Garcia-Herranz, M. Paolotti, D. & Tizzoni, M. (2022). Complex systems for the most vulnerable. Journal of Physics: Complexity, 3(2), 021001.
    69. Panke, D. & Stapel, S. (2024). Multi-level governance. In Handbook of Regional Cooperation and Integration (pp. 417-430). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    70. Reyes, J. D. Self, (2022). Organization, and Complex System: A Leadership Framework.
    71. Sánchez-García, J. Y. Núñez-Ríos, J. E. López-Hernández, C. & Rodríguez-Magaña, A. (2023). Modeling organizational resilience in SMEs: a system dynamics approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(1), 29-50.
    72. Schakel, A. H. (2016). Applying multilevel governance Handbook of research methods and applications in political science: Edward Elgar Publishing
    73. Scognamiglio, F. Sancino, A. Caló, F. Jacklin‐Jarvis, C. & Rees, J. (2023). The public sector and co‐creation in turbulent times: A systematic literature review on robust governance in the COVID‐19 emergency. Public administration, 101(1), 53-70.
    74. Siegenfeld, A. F. & Bar-Yam, Y. (2020). An introduction to complex systems science and its applications. Complexity, 20(6), 1-16.
    75. Stephenson, P. (2017). Twenty years of multi-level governance:‘Where does it come from? What is it? Where is it going?’. In Frameworks of the European Union's Policy Process (pp. 11-31). Routledge.
    76. Tazehdel, S. Shieh, E. Seyedalhosseini, S. M. & Habibi, K. (2021). Identification And Prioritization of Integrated Metropolitan Area Management Indicators (case Study: Mashhad Metropolitan Area). Creative City Design, 4(2), 52-60.
    77. Tosun, J., Saad, E. L., Glückler, J., Irigoyen Rios, A., & Lehmann, R. (2023). Country‐Specific Participation Patterns in Transnational Governance Initiatives on Sustainability: Preliminary Insights and Research Agenda. Global Challenges, 7(8), 2-11.‏
    78. Touati, N. Maillet, L. Paquette, M. A. Denis, J. L. & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Understanding multilevel governance processes through complexity theory: an empirical case study of the Quebec health-care system. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(3), 205-217.
    79. Traxler, A., Jadrná, M., & Klukan, M. (2021). Competences and hierarchy of subsystems of the 1st order of organizational system.‏
    80. Trein, P. Thomann, E. & Maggetti, M. (2019). Integration, functional differentiation and problem‐solving in multilevel governance. Public Administration, 97(2), 339-354.
    81. Tuczek, H. C. Flore, A. Nuhn, H. F. & Schaffitzel, N. (2022). A systemic approach to agile management and self-organization for a sustainable transformation of organizations. In Research on Project, Programme and Portfolio Management: Projects as an Arena for Self-Organizing (pp. 29-47). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    82. Unterhitzenberger, C. Müller, R. Vaagaasar, A. L. Ke, Y. Alonderiene, R. Minelgaite, I. & Mongeon, M. (2023). A multilevel governance model for Interorganizational project networks. Project Management Journal, 54(1), 88-105.
    83. Walter, A. T. (2021). Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 343-391.‏
    84. Wang, Q. Hou, H. & Li, Z. (2022). Participative leadership: a literature review and prospects for future research. Frontiers in psychology, 13(1), 1-12.
    85. Weyer, J. (2015). Governance of complex systems: a multi-level model.‏ online: https://d-nb.info/109576778X/34
    86. Zattoni, A., & van Ees, H. (2023). A multilevel perspective on corporate governance: firm, industry, and macro environments. In Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management.‏
    87. Zapata-Barrero, R. (2023). New scales of migration governance in the Mediterranean: Regional cities in the spotlight. European Urban and Regional Studies, 30(2), 121-134.
    88. Zürn, M. (2020). Unravelling multi-level governance systems. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 784-791.
حکمرانی و توسعه
دوره 4، شماره 4
دی 1403
صفحه 39-82

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار