The Learner Governance Framework: A Convergence of Philosophical Discourses Emphasizing the Capabilities and Roles of Oversight Mechanisms

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Public Administration, Department of Public Administration & Public Policy Making, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Prof., Department of Public Administration & Public Policy Making, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Prof., Department of Public Administration & Public Policy Making, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This study aims to design a multilayered model of learning governance, focusing on integrating diverse philosophical principles to develop governance systems and enhance the performance of oversight institutions. Initially, by reviewing philosophies such as Islamic, existentialism, data-driven, systems thinking, phenomenology, utilitarianism, poststructuralism, and critical theory, key concepts including justice, transparency, participation, well-being, and continuous learning were extracted. These concepts were then compared through a comparative analysis to identify points of divergence and synergy among them.

A systemic analysis organized these concepts into a five-layer model: (1) Foundational Values, including justice and human dignity; (2) Analytical Tools, based on data-driven methodologies and systemic feedback; (3) Critical and Reflective Oversight, for controlling power structures; (4) Interaction and Participation, to reflect the needs of the populace; and (5) Outcome Orientation and Impacts, to evaluate the consequences of policies. Each layer delineates the roles and responsibilities of oversight institutions in achieving the objectives of learning governance.

The findings indicate that the multilayered learning governance model, by integrating ethical values such as justice and human dignity with advanced data-driven analytical tools, offers a flexible and dynamic framework for designing governance systems. This model emphasizes transparency, social feedback, and reflective oversight, transforming governance from a static system into a more adaptive and responsive framework. Moreover, it enhances the capacity to manage modern complexities and forecast policy outcomes through innovative technologies and active citizen participation.

Keywords

References

  1. 1- ابراهیمی کیاسری، حمیدرضا؛ الوانی، سید مهدی؛ معمارزاده، غلامرضا. (1402). طراحی الگوی مشارکت شهروندان در خط مشی های نظام آموزشی و پرورشی ایران با رویکرد چندروشی. مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی.13(46). 93-66. doi: 10.22034/sspp.2023.562459.3291

    2- ابراهیمی کیاسری، حمیدرضا؛ الوانی، سید مهدی؛ معمارزاده، غلامرضا. (1402). ارزیابی ترکیبی از عوامل مؤثر بر مشارکت شهروندان در خط‌مشی‌های نظام آموزشی و پرورشی ایران. مدیریت دولتی. 15(2) . 257- 230. doi: 10.22059/jipa.2023.351493.3247

    3- برزگر، ابراهیم ؛ بهمن آبادی، شهلا (1397). عدالت اجتماعی در آرای آیت الله جوادی آملی از منظر وظیفه گرایی و نتیجه گرایی. اندیشه سیاسی در اسلام. زمستان 1397 شماره 18

    4- خمینی، روح‌الله. (1392).  ولایت فقیه: حکومت اسلامی. تهران: مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی.

    5- مهاجر، محسن (1378). اندیشه سیاسی ملاصدرا.  قبسات. شماره 10 و 11

    6- مطهری، مرتضی. (1399).  عدل الهی. تهران: انتشارات صدرا.

    7- مهدیان، روح اله؛ ربیعی مندجین، محمدرضا؛ الوانی سیدمهدی (1403). طراحی مدل مدیریت دانش حاصل از ارزیابی‌های نهادهای نظارتیِ ناظر بر خط‌مشی‌های عمومی ایران. مدیریت دولتی. DOI: 10.22059/jipa.2024.384467.3596

    1. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1944). Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Verso.
    2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley.
    3. Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    4. Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory—the skeleton of science. Management Science, 2(3), 197–208.
    5. Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2016). Data in action: Data-driven decision making in US manufacturing. Available at SSRN 2722502.
    6. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
    7. Crowell, S. (2020). Existentialism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/existentialism/.
    8. Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2007). Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning. Harvard Business Press.
    9. Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501722954.
    10. Derrida, J. (1978). Speech and Phenomena. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110612220.
    11. Ebrahimikiasari, H., Alvani, S. M., & Memarzadeh, G. (2023). Designing Public Participation Model in Iranian Educational Policies by Multi-Method Orientation. Strategic Studies of public policy, 13(46), 66-93. doi: 10.22034/sspp.2023.562459.3291 (in Persian)
    12. Ebrahimi Kiasari, H., Alvani, S. M., & Memarzadeh Tehran, G. (2023). Combinational Assessment of the Factors Affecting Public Participation in Iranian Educational Policies. Journal of Public Administration, 15(2), 230-257. doi: 10.22059/jipa.2023.351493.3247 (in Persian)
    13. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473
    14. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203403736.
    15. Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Discourse. Paris: Gallimard.
    16. Forester, J. (1999). The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. MIT Press.
    17. Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. Fraser’s Critique of Critical Theory, 21(4), 23–43.
    18. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
    19. Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035.
    20. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.
    21. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.
    22. Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. Polity Press.
    23. Horkheimer, M. (1937). Traditional and critical theory. In Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Continuum.
    24. Husserl, E. (1913). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Springer.
    25. Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2016). The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 371–377.
    26. Kierkegaard, S. (1843). Fear and Trembling (H. V. Hong & E. H. Hong, Trans.). Princeton University Press.
    27. Kitchin, R. (2014). The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909473.
    28. Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554476.
    29. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Penguin Books.
    30. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
    31. McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 60–68.
    32. Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
    33. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of Perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.
    34. Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son, and Bourn.
    35. (2015). The Framework for Good Governance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264233529-en.
    36. Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press.
    37. Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big Data, 1(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2013.1508.
    38. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    39. Redman, T. C. (2013). Data Driven: Profiting from Your Most Important Business Asset. Harvard Business Press.
    40. Richmond, B. (1993). Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9(2), 113–133.
    41. Sartre, J. P. (2007). Existentialism is a Humanism. Yale University Press.
    42. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
    43. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday/Currency.
    44. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297580.001.0001.
    45. Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 553–572.
    46. Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge University Press.
    47. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
    48. Strong, D. M., Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2008). Organizational governance of knowledge and learning. Decision Support Systems, 44(3), 749–764
    49. Strumińska‐Kutra, M. (2018). Metagovernance, governance, and learning: Critical reflections on adaptive governance. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 239–256
    50. United Nations Development Programme. (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/925cbf3c-en.
    51. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller.
    52. Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. E. (2013). Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: A revolution that will transform supply chain design and management. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12019.
Governance and Development
Volume 5, Issue 4
December 2025
Pages 5-29

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics